| 제목 | Comparison Between Fimasartan Versus Other Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Patients With Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 작성자 | 관리자 | 등록일 | 2023-06-30 |
내용
Comparison Between Fimasartan Versus Other Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Patients With Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Jihoon Kim # 1, Danbee Kang # 2, Sung Eun Kim # 3, Hyejeong Park 2, Taek Kyu Park 1, Joo Myung Lee 1, Jeong Hoon Yang 1, Young Bin Song 1, Jin-Ho Choi 1, Seung-Hyuk Choi 1, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon 1, Eliseo Guallar 2, Juhee Cho 4, Joo-Yong Hahn 5
Affiliations
- PMID: 37365730
- PMCID: PMC10293657
- DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e202
Abstract
Backgrounds: Fimasartan is the most recently developed, potent, and long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). However, data are limited regarding treatment effects of fimasartan in patients with heart failure.
Methods: Between 2010 and 2016, patients who underwent coronary revascularization for myocardial infarction (MI) with heart failure and prescription of ARB at hospital discharge were enrolled from the Korean nationwide medical insurance data. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients receiving fimasartan and those receiving other ARBs (candesartan, valsartan, losartan, telmisartan, olmesartan, and irbesartan). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke.
Results: Of 2,802 eligible patients, fimasartan was prescribed to 124 patients (4.4%). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.0-3.9), 613 events of the primary outcome occurred. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between patients receiving fimasartan and those receiving other ARBs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-1.45). Compared with patients receiving other ARBs, those receiving fimasartan had comparable incidence of all-cause death (adjusted HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.30-1.63), recurrent MI (adjusted HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.49-3.34), hospitalization for heart failure (adjusted HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.27-1.84), and stroke (adjusted HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.18-1.96).
Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort, fimasartan, compared with other ARBs, had comparable treatment effects for a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke in patients with heart failure after MI.
Keywords: Angiotensin Receptor Blocker; Heart Failure; Myocardial Infarction.
